Many times, one player will have played more cards, made more compelling posts, or had a more character-centric interest or effect on the outcome of a challenge than some other players.

However, as it stands, the player who plays the last card will always get to control the way the challenge is resolved, leading to "ebay sniping" style play in many games where everyone tries to hold out and be the last person to play a card on a challenge. This is bollocks.

While it wouldn't work for all games, I'd love to see a setting where the Narrator decides which player assumes control at the end of a challenge, to discourage this sort of play. We're doing that in our private games already through comments, but an actual feature would make public games less potentially toxic.